Jason Kenney’s Selective Memory on CTV - May 26, 2010

Jason Kenney on May, 26, 2010:
I was in parliament as an opposition member for nine or ten years. I was a pretty aggressive opposition member, I don’t ever recall in that decade current political staff members of the government being called before committees to testify. 

Then:

“The witness list originally included some 130 prospective witnesses. To date the committee has heard from little more than 40 of those witnesses…We have not heard from dozens of political staffers like Mario Laguë, Bruce Hartley, Karl Littler, Terrie O’Leary, Warren Kinsella, Jean Carle, Albano Gidaro, Elly Alboim Earnscliffe, and Jacques Hudon…” 

thisisyourgovernment:

Constitutional Crisis in Canada (YouTube)

Parliament, under the constitution, under the 1867 constituion of Canada has its privileges constitutionally protected, and one of those privileges is the right, not the option, the right to receive documents from the government, not censored. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s an issue of national security. That’s the law in Canada. And it’s the law in Britain and its the law in other parlimentary democracies.

[…]

This is really a tremendous scam that Mr. Nicholson has come up with to make it seem that there is a legal question, but because there isn’t actually a legal question, because it is absolutley clear that parliament is entitled to uncensored documents, 100 percent, Mr. Nicholson isn’t willing to go to a real court. If he went to a real court, he’d get the answer and he’d get an answer he didn’t like.

University of Ottawa Law Professor Amir Attaran on Justice Ministers Bob Nicholson’s appointment of a former SCOC judge to review redacted documents.

Related: Release of budget details renews charges of contempt